Ethical principles
OBLIGATIONS OF THE CHIEF AND RESPONSIBLE EDITOR AND THE EDITORIAL EDITOR
The editor-in-chief, in co-operation with the editorial board of the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik, makes the final decision on which manuscripts will be published. In his decision, the Editor-in-Chief is guided by the editorial policy and takes into account the relevant legal regulations, especially in connection with copyright infringement and plagiarism.
The editor-in-chief reserves the right to evaluate manuscripts received at his discretion and not to publish them if he determines that they do not meet the prescribed content and formal criteria. The editors will inform the author as soon as possible after receipt of the manuscript whether the text has been accepted for publication.
The editor-in-chief must not have a conflict of interest concerning the manuscripts that are reviewed by the editors. If such a conflict of interest exists, the editors decide on the choice of reviewers and the fate of the manuscript. If one or more members of the editorial board have a conflict of interest, these members are excluded from the selection of reviewers and the decision on the fate of the manuscript. The editor and the members of the editorial board are obliged to report the existence of conflicts of interest in good time.
The editor-in-chief is obliged to form a judgement on the manuscript based on its content, without racial, gender, religious, ethnic or political bias.
OBLIGATIONS OF THE AUTHOR
Authors warrant that the manuscript represents their original contribution, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to several journals is a violation of ethical standards. Such a manuscript is excluded from further consideration.
If the submitted manuscript is the result of a scientific research project or that, in the previous version, it was presented at a meeting in the form of an oral communication (under the same or a similar title), more detailed information about the project, conference, etc., is provided in the footnote at the beginning of the text. A work that has already been published in a magazine cannot be reprinted in the Vojnoistorijski glasnik unless it is a matter of translation, adaptation and changes based on additional research and the like, which must be indicated.
Authors are obliged to adhere to ethical standards related to scientific research work. The authors also guarantee that the manuscript does not contain unfounded or illegal claims and does not violate the rights of others. The publisher will not bear any responsibility in the event of any claims for damages.
Content of work
The paper should contain sufficient detail and references to enable reviewers and readers to verify the claims made in it. Deliberately making false claims is a violation of ethical standards.
The authors bear all responsibility for the content of the submitted manuscripts. They are obliged, if necessary, to obtain the consent of all persons or institutions that directly participated in the research presented in the manuscript before their publication.
Authors who wish to include illustrations, tables or other materials that have already been published somewhere in the work must obtain the consent of the copyright holder. Material for which such evidence is not submitted will be considered the original work of the author. If, after the publication of the work, there is any objection from the copyright holders that some material has been published without their consent, the magazine Vojnoistorijski glasnik will publish a correction or withdrawal of the work and clearly state that the error was the author's fault.
Authorship
Authors are obliged to list as authors only they and all persons who significantly contributed to the content of the manuscript. If other persons other than the authors participated in important aspects of the research project and the preparation of the manuscript, their contribution should be mentioned in a note or acknowledgement.
Citation of source
Authors are required to properly cite research and manuscript sources. Information obtained in private conversations or correspondence with third parties, when reviewing project applications or manuscripts, etc., may not be used without the express permission of the source.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism, i.e. taking other people's ideas, words or other forms of creative expression and presenting them as your own, is a gross violation of scientific and publishing ethics. Plagiarism can also include copyright infringement, which is punishable by law.
Plagiarism includes the following:
● verbatim or almost verbatim downloading or deliberate paraphrasing (to conceal plagiarism) of parts of other authors' texts without clearly indicating the source or marking the copied fragments (for example, using quotation marks) concerning the source.
● copying images or tables from other people's works without proper citation of the source and the permission of the author or copyright holder.
Manuscripts with clear indications of plagiarism will be rejected and will be considered if the same author submits a new paper.
If a paper published in the journal is found to be plagiarized, such paper will be retracted by the procedure described in the Retraction of Already Published Papers section.
Conflict of interest
Authors are obliged to indicate in their work financial or any other conflicts of interest that could influence the presented results and interpretations.
Errors in published papers
If authors discover an important error in their work after its publication, they are obliged to inform the editor or publisher about it as soon as possible and to cooperate with them to withdraw or correct the work.
By handing over the manuscript to the editors of the Vojnoistorijski glasnik, the authors undertake to comply with the aforementioned obligations.
OBLIGATIONS OF REVIEWERS
The reviewers are obliged to submit to the editor an assessment of the scientific value of the manuscript in a professional, well-argued, impartial manner and within the set deadlines.
The reviewers evaluate the papers concerning the compatibility of the paper's topic with the profile of the journal, the relevance of the researched area and applied methods, the originality and scientific relevance of the data presented in the manuscript, the style of scientific presentation and the text's equipment with scientific apparatus.
A reviewer who has reasonable suspicions or knowledge of a violation of ethical standards by the author is obliged to inform the editor about it. The reviewer should indicate important published works that the authors may not have cited. He should also warn the editor about important similarities and coincidences between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work or manuscript that is under review in another journal if he has personal knowledge about it. If there is knowledge that the same manuscript is being considered in several journals at the same time, the reviewer is obliged to inform the editor about it.
The reviewer must not have a conflict of interest with the authors or the funder of the research. If he reasonably suspects that he is in a conflict of interest, the reviewer is obliged to inform the editor about it without delay.
A reviewer who considers himself/herself incompetent for the topic or area covered by the manuscript is obliged to inform the editor.
The review must be objective. Comments concerning the personality of the author are considered inappropriate. The judgment of reviewers must be clear and supported by arguments.
Manuscripts sent to a reviewer are considered confidential documents. Reviewers may not use unpublished material from submitted manuscripts for their research without the express written permission of the authors, and information and ideas expressed in submitted manuscripts must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
Received works that, in the opinion of the editor-in-chief and editor-in-chief, meet the basic requirements in terms of content and form, and are subject to anonymous reviews by at least two external reviewers. The goal of the review is to help the editor decide whether the work should be accepted or rejected and to improve the quality of the manuscript through the process of communication with the authors.
The selection of reviewers is made by the editors. Reviewers must have relevant knowledge related to the field of the manuscript and must not be from the same institution as the author, nor must they be authors who have recently published publications together (as co-authors) with any of the authors of the submitted work. Paper reviewers do not receive fees.
The editor-in-chief sends the reviewers the text of the paper without the name and affiliation of the author and other data based on which the identity of the author could be revealed, as well as the review form adopted by the editorial office of the Military Historical Gazette. The form contains questions that the reviewer should answer regarding the originality of the work, the applied methodological procedure, the sources and literature used, and the language and style of the work. The reviewer gives an opinion on whether the work should be published without changes, with changes or not. The reviewer proposes the categorization of the paper (original scientific paper, review paper, short or preliminary communication, scientific criticism, that is, polemic and critical edition of scientific material). In a separate part of the form, the reviewer can state remarks, proposals and suggestions, which, unsigned, are delivered to the author. Before, during and after the review process, the identity of the author remains unknown to the reviewers and the identity of the reviewers remains unknown to the authors.
Throughout the process, the reviewers act independently of each other. Reviewers do not know the identity of other reviewers. If the decisions of the reviewers are not the same (accept/reject), the editors can ask for the opinion of other reviewers or can decide without additional reviews.
During the review process, the editor-in-chief may request the authors to provide additional information (including primary data), if it is necessary to make a judgment about the scientific contribution of the manuscript. The editor and reviewers must keep such information confidential and must not use it for personal gain.
The editors are obliged to ensure the quality control of the review. In case the authors have serious and well-founded objections to the review, the editors will check whether the review is objective and meets academic standards. If there is doubt about the objectivity or quality of the review, the editor will seek the opinion of other reviewers.
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE SITUATIONS
Any individual or institution may, at any time, report to the editor or newsroom knowledge of violations of ethical standards and other irregularities and provide the necessary information/evidence.
Verification of the allegations and evidence presented
● The editor-in-chief, in agreement with the editorial staff, will decide on the initiation of a procedure aimed at verifying the allegations and evidence presented.
● During that procedure, all presented evidence will be considered confidential material and will be presented only to those persons who are directly involved in the procedure.
● Persons who are suspected of having violated ethical standards will be allowed to respond to raised doubts and objections.
● If it is established that irregularities have indeed occurred, it will be assessed whether they should be characterized as minor or gross violations of ethical standards.
Minor violation of ethical standards
Situations characterized as minor violations of ethical standards will be resolved in direct communication with the persons who committed the violation, without the involvement of third parties, e.g.:
● by notifying the person responsible for the irregularity that a minor violation has occurred resulting from a misunderstanding or misapplication of academic standards;
● a warning letter to the person who concealed a minor violation of ethical standards.
Gross violation of ethical standards
Decisions regarding gross violations of ethical standards are made by the editor-in-chief in cooperation with the editorial staff and, if necessary, a small group of experts. The measures they will take may be the following (and may be applied individually or simultaneously):
● publication of a press release or editorial describing a case of violation of ethical standards;
● sending an official notification to the managers or employers of the person responsible for the violation;
● withdrawal of a published paper by the procedure described in the section Withdrawal of already published papers;
● authors will be prohibited from submitting papers to the journal during a certain period;
● familiarizing relevant professional organizations or competent authorities with the case so that they can take appropriate measures.
When resolving disputed situations, the editorial office of the journal is guided by the guidelines and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE: http://publicationethics.org/resources/.
WITHDRAWAL OF ALREADY PUBLISHED WORKS
In case of violation of the rights of publishers, copyright holders or authors, violation of professional ethical codes, i.e. in the case of sending the same manuscript to several journals at the same time, false claims of authorship, plagiarism, manipulation of data for fraud, as well as in all other cases of gross violation of ethical standards, the published work must be withdrawn. In some cases, already published work can be retracted to correct subsequently observed errors.
The standards for resolving situations when a paper must be retracted are defined by libraries and scientific bodies, and the same practice is adopted by the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik: in the electronic version of the original article (the one that is being retracted), a link (HTML link) is established with notice of withdrawal. A retracted article is saved in its original form, but with a watermark on the PDF document, on each page, indicating that the article has been retracted (RETRACTED).
OPEN ACCESS
The journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik is available in open-access mode. Articles published in the journal can be downloaded for free from the journal's website and used by Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivs 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). In the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik, the process of submitting manuscripts, reviewing and publishing works is free.
SELF-ARCHIVING
The journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik allows authors to deposit the final, published version of the manuscript in PDF format in an institutional repository and/or non-commercial database or to publish it on personal websites (including non-social media profiles for scholars, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu etc.) and/or on the website of the institution where they are employed, and by the provisions of the license Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivs 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) in any time after publication in the journal. In doing so, the basic bibliographic data about the article published in the journal must be provided (authors, title of the paper, title of the journal, volume, volume, pagination), and the URL address where the article was originally published, i.e. the identifier of the digital object - published DOI must be provided article in the form of an HTML link.
COPYRIGHT
When a manuscript is accepted for publication, authors transfer to the publisher the following non-exclusive rights to the manuscript, including supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
● the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including printing on demand;
● the right to print proofs, reprints and special editions of manuscripts;
● the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
● the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means, including but not limited to photocopying, and the right to distribute these copies;
● the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using any data carrier or storage medium, especially in machine-readable/digitized form on data carriers such as hard disk, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), minidisk, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript from those data carriers;
● the right to save the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transfer the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
● the right to make the manuscript available to the public or closed groups of users based on individual requests for use on a monitor or other readers (including electronic book readers) and in printed form for users, either via the Internet, online services, or via internal or external networks.
The authors reserve the right to translate the article into another language, to use it in publications that represent a compilation of their works, and to use it in a doctoral dissertation or monograph, for non-commercial purposes, on the condition that they state that this work is a derivative of the article published in the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik. In doing so, the basic bibliographic data of the original article published in the journal must be specified (author/s, paper title, journal title, volume, volume, pagination), and the identifier of the digital object - DOI of the published article in the form of an HTML link, i.e. URL, must be specified the address where the article was originally published.
Third parties can use the article in a way that is not determined by the Editorial Policy and provisions of the Creative Commons license - Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) only if they receive the written consent of the publisher of the journal (requests should be sent to the electronic address of the editorial office: vig@mod.gov.rs).
DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the editors and members of the magazine's editorial staff. Authors assume legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in their works. The publisher will not bear any responsibility in the event of any claims for damages.
The editor-in-chief, in co-operation with the editorial board of the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik, makes the final decision on which manuscripts will be published. In his decision, the Editor-in-Chief is guided by the editorial policy and takes into account the relevant legal regulations, especially in connection with copyright infringement and plagiarism.
The editor-in-chief reserves the right to evaluate manuscripts received at his discretion and not to publish them if he determines that they do not meet the prescribed content and formal criteria. The editors will inform the author as soon as possible after receipt of the manuscript whether the text has been accepted for publication.
The editor-in-chief must not have a conflict of interest concerning the manuscripts that are reviewed by the editors. If such a conflict of interest exists, the editors decide on the choice of reviewers and the fate of the manuscript. If one or more members of the editorial board have a conflict of interest, these members are excluded from the selection of reviewers and the decision on the fate of the manuscript. The editor and the members of the editorial board are obliged to report the existence of conflicts of interest in good time.
The editor-in-chief is obliged to form a judgement on the manuscript based on its content, without racial, gender, religious, ethnic or political bias.
OBLIGATIONS OF THE AUTHOR
Authors warrant that the manuscript represents their original contribution, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to several journals is a violation of ethical standards. Such a manuscript is excluded from further consideration.
If the submitted manuscript is the result of a scientific research project or that, in the previous version, it was presented at a meeting in the form of an oral communication (under the same or a similar title), more detailed information about the project, conference, etc., is provided in the footnote at the beginning of the text. A work that has already been published in a magazine cannot be reprinted in the Vojnoistorijski glasnik unless it is a matter of translation, adaptation and changes based on additional research and the like, which must be indicated.
Authors are obliged to adhere to ethical standards related to scientific research work. The authors also guarantee that the manuscript does not contain unfounded or illegal claims and does not violate the rights of others. The publisher will not bear any responsibility in the event of any claims for damages.
Content of work
The paper should contain sufficient detail and references to enable reviewers and readers to verify the claims made in it. Deliberately making false claims is a violation of ethical standards.
The authors bear all responsibility for the content of the submitted manuscripts. They are obliged, if necessary, to obtain the consent of all persons or institutions that directly participated in the research presented in the manuscript before their publication.
Authors who wish to include illustrations, tables or other materials that have already been published somewhere in the work must obtain the consent of the copyright holder. Material for which such evidence is not submitted will be considered the original work of the author. If, after the publication of the work, there is any objection from the copyright holders that some material has been published without their consent, the magazine Vojnoistorijski glasnik will publish a correction or withdrawal of the work and clearly state that the error was the author's fault.
Authorship
Authors are obliged to list as authors only they and all persons who significantly contributed to the content of the manuscript. If other persons other than the authors participated in important aspects of the research project and the preparation of the manuscript, their contribution should be mentioned in a note or acknowledgement.
Citation of source
Authors are required to properly cite research and manuscript sources. Information obtained in private conversations or correspondence with third parties, when reviewing project applications or manuscripts, etc., may not be used without the express permission of the source.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism, i.e. taking other people's ideas, words or other forms of creative expression and presenting them as your own, is a gross violation of scientific and publishing ethics. Plagiarism can also include copyright infringement, which is punishable by law.
Plagiarism includes the following:
● verbatim or almost verbatim downloading or deliberate paraphrasing (to conceal plagiarism) of parts of other authors' texts without clearly indicating the source or marking the copied fragments (for example, using quotation marks) concerning the source.
● copying images or tables from other people's works without proper citation of the source and the permission of the author or copyright holder.
Manuscripts with clear indications of plagiarism will be rejected and will be considered if the same author submits a new paper.
If a paper published in the journal is found to be plagiarized, such paper will be retracted by the procedure described in the Retraction of Already Published Papers section.
Conflict of interest
Authors are obliged to indicate in their work financial or any other conflicts of interest that could influence the presented results and interpretations.
Errors in published papers
If authors discover an important error in their work after its publication, they are obliged to inform the editor or publisher about it as soon as possible and to cooperate with them to withdraw or correct the work.
By handing over the manuscript to the editors of the Vojnoistorijski glasnik, the authors undertake to comply with the aforementioned obligations.
OBLIGATIONS OF REVIEWERS
The reviewers are obliged to submit to the editor an assessment of the scientific value of the manuscript in a professional, well-argued, impartial manner and within the set deadlines.
The reviewers evaluate the papers concerning the compatibility of the paper's topic with the profile of the journal, the relevance of the researched area and applied methods, the originality and scientific relevance of the data presented in the manuscript, the style of scientific presentation and the text's equipment with scientific apparatus.
A reviewer who has reasonable suspicions or knowledge of a violation of ethical standards by the author is obliged to inform the editor about it. The reviewer should indicate important published works that the authors may not have cited. He should also warn the editor about important similarities and coincidences between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work or manuscript that is under review in another journal if he has personal knowledge about it. If there is knowledge that the same manuscript is being considered in several journals at the same time, the reviewer is obliged to inform the editor about it.
The reviewer must not have a conflict of interest with the authors or the funder of the research. If he reasonably suspects that he is in a conflict of interest, the reviewer is obliged to inform the editor about it without delay.
A reviewer who considers himself/herself incompetent for the topic or area covered by the manuscript is obliged to inform the editor.
The review must be objective. Comments concerning the personality of the author are considered inappropriate. The judgment of reviewers must be clear and supported by arguments.
Manuscripts sent to a reviewer are considered confidential documents. Reviewers may not use unpublished material from submitted manuscripts for their research without the express written permission of the authors, and information and ideas expressed in submitted manuscripts must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
Received works that, in the opinion of the editor-in-chief and editor-in-chief, meet the basic requirements in terms of content and form, and are subject to anonymous reviews by at least two external reviewers. The goal of the review is to help the editor decide whether the work should be accepted or rejected and to improve the quality of the manuscript through the process of communication with the authors.
The selection of reviewers is made by the editors. Reviewers must have relevant knowledge related to the field of the manuscript and must not be from the same institution as the author, nor must they be authors who have recently published publications together (as co-authors) with any of the authors of the submitted work. Paper reviewers do not receive fees.
The editor-in-chief sends the reviewers the text of the paper without the name and affiliation of the author and other data based on which the identity of the author could be revealed, as well as the review form adopted by the editorial office of the Military Historical Gazette. The form contains questions that the reviewer should answer regarding the originality of the work, the applied methodological procedure, the sources and literature used, and the language and style of the work. The reviewer gives an opinion on whether the work should be published without changes, with changes or not. The reviewer proposes the categorization of the paper (original scientific paper, review paper, short or preliminary communication, scientific criticism, that is, polemic and critical edition of scientific material). In a separate part of the form, the reviewer can state remarks, proposals and suggestions, which, unsigned, are delivered to the author. Before, during and after the review process, the identity of the author remains unknown to the reviewers and the identity of the reviewers remains unknown to the authors.
Throughout the process, the reviewers act independently of each other. Reviewers do not know the identity of other reviewers. If the decisions of the reviewers are not the same (accept/reject), the editors can ask for the opinion of other reviewers or can decide without additional reviews.
During the review process, the editor-in-chief may request the authors to provide additional information (including primary data), if it is necessary to make a judgment about the scientific contribution of the manuscript. The editor and reviewers must keep such information confidential and must not use it for personal gain.
The editors are obliged to ensure the quality control of the review. In case the authors have serious and well-founded objections to the review, the editors will check whether the review is objective and meets academic standards. If there is doubt about the objectivity or quality of the review, the editor will seek the opinion of other reviewers.
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE SITUATIONS
Any individual or institution may, at any time, report to the editor or newsroom knowledge of violations of ethical standards and other irregularities and provide the necessary information/evidence.
Verification of the allegations and evidence presented
● The editor-in-chief, in agreement with the editorial staff, will decide on the initiation of a procedure aimed at verifying the allegations and evidence presented.
● During that procedure, all presented evidence will be considered confidential material and will be presented only to those persons who are directly involved in the procedure.
● Persons who are suspected of having violated ethical standards will be allowed to respond to raised doubts and objections.
● If it is established that irregularities have indeed occurred, it will be assessed whether they should be characterized as minor or gross violations of ethical standards.
Minor violation of ethical standards
Situations characterized as minor violations of ethical standards will be resolved in direct communication with the persons who committed the violation, without the involvement of third parties, e.g.:
● by notifying the person responsible for the irregularity that a minor violation has occurred resulting from a misunderstanding or misapplication of academic standards;
● a warning letter to the person who concealed a minor violation of ethical standards.
Gross violation of ethical standards
Decisions regarding gross violations of ethical standards are made by the editor-in-chief in cooperation with the editorial staff and, if necessary, a small group of experts. The measures they will take may be the following (and may be applied individually or simultaneously):
● publication of a press release or editorial describing a case of violation of ethical standards;
● sending an official notification to the managers or employers of the person responsible for the violation;
● withdrawal of a published paper by the procedure described in the section Withdrawal of already published papers;
● authors will be prohibited from submitting papers to the journal during a certain period;
● familiarizing relevant professional organizations or competent authorities with the case so that they can take appropriate measures.
When resolving disputed situations, the editorial office of the journal is guided by the guidelines and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE: http://publicationethics.org/resources/.
WITHDRAWAL OF ALREADY PUBLISHED WORKS
In case of violation of the rights of publishers, copyright holders or authors, violation of professional ethical codes, i.e. in the case of sending the same manuscript to several journals at the same time, false claims of authorship, plagiarism, manipulation of data for fraud, as well as in all other cases of gross violation of ethical standards, the published work must be withdrawn. In some cases, already published work can be retracted to correct subsequently observed errors.
The standards for resolving situations when a paper must be retracted are defined by libraries and scientific bodies, and the same practice is adopted by the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik: in the electronic version of the original article (the one that is being retracted), a link (HTML link) is established with notice of withdrawal. A retracted article is saved in its original form, but with a watermark on the PDF document, on each page, indicating that the article has been retracted (RETRACTED).
OPEN ACCESS
The journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik is available in open-access mode. Articles published in the journal can be downloaded for free from the journal's website and used by Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivs 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). In the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik, the process of submitting manuscripts, reviewing and publishing works is free.
SELF-ARCHIVING
The journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik allows authors to deposit the final, published version of the manuscript in PDF format in an institutional repository and/or non-commercial database or to publish it on personal websites (including non-social media profiles for scholars, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu etc.) and/or on the website of the institution where they are employed, and by the provisions of the license Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivs 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) in any time after publication in the journal. In doing so, the basic bibliographic data about the article published in the journal must be provided (authors, title of the paper, title of the journal, volume, volume, pagination), and the URL address where the article was originally published, i.e. the identifier of the digital object - published DOI must be provided article in the form of an HTML link.
COPYRIGHT
When a manuscript is accepted for publication, authors transfer to the publisher the following non-exclusive rights to the manuscript, including supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:
● the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including printing on demand;
● the right to print proofs, reprints and special editions of manuscripts;
● the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
● the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means, including but not limited to photocopying, and the right to distribute these copies;
● the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using any data carrier or storage medium, especially in machine-readable/digitized form on data carriers such as hard disk, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), minidisk, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript from those data carriers;
● the right to save the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transfer the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
● the right to make the manuscript available to the public or closed groups of users based on individual requests for use on a monitor or other readers (including electronic book readers) and in printed form for users, either via the Internet, online services, or via internal or external networks.
The authors reserve the right to translate the article into another language, to use it in publications that represent a compilation of their works, and to use it in a doctoral dissertation or monograph, for non-commercial purposes, on the condition that they state that this work is a derivative of the article published in the journal Vojnoistorijski glasnik. In doing so, the basic bibliographic data of the original article published in the journal must be specified (author/s, paper title, journal title, volume, volume, pagination), and the identifier of the digital object - DOI of the published article in the form of an HTML link, i.e. URL, must be specified the address where the article was originally published.
Third parties can use the article in a way that is not determined by the Editorial Policy and provisions of the Creative Commons license - Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) only if they receive the written consent of the publisher of the journal (requests should be sent to the electronic address of the editorial office: vig@mod.gov.rs).
DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the editors and members of the magazine's editorial staff. Authors assume legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in their works. The publisher will not bear any responsibility in the event of any claims for damages.